Brookfield Executives Vote ‘No’ To Leasing City Land For New Cellular Tower

BROOKFIELD – Brookfield elected officials voted unanimously against an AT&T cell tower project to be located in the public works complex at a board meeting this week.

Homeland Towers, LLC had hoped to lease land at 93 Grays Bridge Road for a 165-foot cell tower, paying the city about $ 20,000 a year in rental fees, but elected officials agreed the additional revenue was not worth it. the space it would occupy within the public works enclosure.

“They want this property in perpetuity, and we don’t know what needs we will have in the future for our public works department,” Dunn said. “It didn’t seem like a good compromise at the moment. “

The company wanted to lease the space for a period of 55 years.

In one letter to dunn, Homeland Towers said the facility “would create an additional source of revenue for the city while providing improved cell coverage and critical infrastructure for public safety.”

Selectman Harry Slater said the money the deal would bring in was not worth leasing the town‘s land.

Selectman Sue Slater, who virtually attended the meeting, added that the proposed tower would be located near the homes.

Dunn said the city‘s current coverage is sufficient and that while another cell phone tower would help the city’s resilience, it wasn’t something the city desperately needed.

“There is no immediate need,” he says. “There are no white dots in this area.”

The city had previously rented another cell tower location at 100 Pocono Road, the Civic Center complex. The lease agreement between the city and Homeland Towers was approved in 2014. During discussions, the first tower encountered no significant opposition from the Brookfielders.

The new cell phone tower would have been still 50 feet taller than the first, according to a meeting minutes from July 31.

Instead, Dunn suggested the company find a commercial lease or even move to a nearby town like Danbury. In these scenarios, Brookfield would still benefit from the service.

Emergency services were in favor of increased communication, Dunn stressed at the meeting.

Shaker asked Dunn if emergency services could still use the enhanced communications services if they were located outside of Brookfield, which Dunn said he would.

Homeland Towers and AT&T offered Sherman a cell tower last year, causing some controversy as some residents raised aesthetic and health concerns during a virtual forum.

However, the proposed 170-foot steel monopole tower, clad with six antennas, was supported by residents, first responders and Sherman leaders who wanted improved wireless communications services in the southern parts of town.

Ultimately, the state’s selection board will decide whether to locate the site for a new cell phone tower, but the city is still able to say “yes” or “no” to leasing. its own properties.

Dunn said Raymond Vergati, regional manager for Homeland Towers, had informed him that the company had “a number of sites” that would be ready to support a cell phone tower.

“It’s not like he can’t find a place,” Dunn said.

Vergati could not be reached for comment at the time of posting.

Although he said Brookfield did not need them immediately, Dunn said it would eventually be useful to have two cell phone towers in case one of them lost power. electricity or would be damaged in a storm.

“Two cell phone towers are better than one,” he said. “We are going to build a new radio system for the police and [emergency services] and fire in the near future, hopefully. So whenever we can add redundancy and more depth to our community facilities, that’s a good thing for them.

Source link

Previous Reported water shortage in Santiago metropolitan area - MercoPress
Next Phuket Town's fresh produce markets hit by COVID infections

No Comment

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *